The Volokh Conspiracy has a very interesting post up today by Eugene Volokh, talking about the right for student groups to criticize each other. Long story short, if it happens at the University of Tulsa law school, the group engaging in criticism faces the possible loss of funding, and possible loss of their "recognition as a legitimate law school organization".
As a law student myself, it seems that criticism, conflict, and debate would go to the heart of what the law school is supposed to teach. Discouraging frank discussion and criticism goes against the heart of what a University, and in particular a law school, is supposed to provide - a good education, and the necessary preparation to practice the profession of law.
Tuesday
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I completely agree. I always found it odd that the politicized groups on my law school campus never said anything about the other's statements in mass emails sent to 1Ls. On one day, each were showing movies (Fahrenheit 9/11 for the liberal group and FahrenHype 9/11 for the conservative group) and neither made any comments about what was said in the other group's showing. Weird. I want to see some spirited debate based, of course, on rational discourse! This is law school! Let's get it on!
Posted by Ex
Post a Comment